Bible book
2 Corinthians
Commentary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown
Save this book and all its available chapters on this device.Book introduction
Introduction to 2 Corinthians
Commentary chapters
Bible book
Commentary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown
Save this book and all its available chapters on this device.Book introduction
Commentary chapters
THE SECOND EPISTLE OF PAUL THE APOSTLE TO THE
CORINTHIANS
[1] [2]
[3] [4]
[5] [6]
[7] [8]
[13]
INTRODUCTION
THE following reasons seem to have induced Paul to write this Second
Epistle to the Corinthians: (1) That he might explain the reasons for
his having deferred to pay them his promised visit, by taking Corinth
as his way to Macedonia
(1Co 4:19;
2Co 1:15, 16;
compare
1Co 16:5);
and so that he might set forth to them his apostolic walk in general
(2Co 1:12, 24; 6:3-13; 7:2).
(2) That he might commend their obedience in reference to the
directions in his First Epistle, and at the same time direct them now
to forgive the offender, as having been punished sufficiently
(2Co 2:1-11; 7:6-16).
(3) That he might urge them to collect for the poor saints at Jerusalem
(2Co 8:1-9, 15).
(4) That he might maintain his apostolic authority and reprove
gainsayers.
The external testimonies for its genuineness are IRENÆUS
[Against Heresies, 3,7,1]; ATHENAGORAS
[Of the Resurrection of the Dead]; CLEMENT OF
ALEXANDRIA
[Miscellanies, 3, p. 94; 4, p. 101]; TERTULLIAN
[On Modesty, 13].
The TIME OF WRITING was after Pentecost, A.D. 57, when Paul left Ephesus for Troas. Having stayed
in the latter place for some time preaching the Gospel with effect
(2Co 2:12),
he went on to Macedonia, being eager to meet Titus there, having been
disappointed in his not coming to Troas, as had been agreed on between
them. Having heard from him the tidings he so much desired of the good
effect produced on the Corinthians by his First Epistle, and after
having tested the liberality of the Macedonian churches
(2Co 8:1),
he wrote this Second Epistle, and then went on to Greece, where he
abode for three months; and then, after travelling by land, reached
Philippi on his return at Passover or Easter, A.D.
58
(Ac 20:1-6).
So that this Epistle must have been written about autumn, A.D. 57.
Macedonia was THE PLACE from which it was written
(2Co 9:2,
where the present tense, "I boast," or "am boasting," implies his
presence then in Macedonia). In Asia (Lydian Asia) he had
undergone some great peril of his life
(2Co 1:8, 9),
whether the reference be [PALEY] to the tumult at
Ephesus
(Ac 19:23-41),
or, as ALFORD thinks, to a dangerous illness in
which he despaired of life. Thence he passed by Troas to Philippi, the
first city which would meet him in entering Macedonia. The importance
of the Philippian Church would induce him to stay there some time; as
also his desire to collect contributions from the Macedonian churches
for the poor saints at Jerusalem. His anxiety of mind is recorded
(2Co 7:5)
as occurring when he came into Macedonia, and therefore must
have been at Philippi, which was the first city of Macedonia in
coming from Troas; and here, too, from
2Co 7:6,
compared with
2Co 7:5,
must have been the scene of his receiving the comforting tidings from
Titus. "Macedonia" is used for Philippi in
2Co 11:9,
as is proved by comparison with
Php 4:15, 16.
So it is probably used here
(2Co 7:5).
ALFORD argues from
2Co 8:1,
where he speaks of the "grace bestowed on the churches (plural)
of Macedonia," that Paul must have visited other churches in
Macedonia, besides Philippi, when he wrote, for example, Thessalonica,
Berea, &c., and that Philippi, the first on his route, is less
likely to have been the scene of his writing than the last on
his route, whichever it was, perhaps Thessalonica. But Philippi, as
being the chief town of the province, was probably the place to which
all the collections of the churches were sent. Ancient tradition, too
(as appears from the subscription to this Epistle), favors the view
that Philippi was the place from which this Epistle was sent by the
hands of Titus who received, besides, a charge to prosecute at Corinth
the collection which he had begun at his first visit
(2Co 8:6).
The STYLE is most varied, and passes rapidly from one phase of
feeling to another; now joyous and consolatory, again severe and full
of reproof; at one time gentle and affectionate, at another, sternly
rebuking opponents and upholding his dignity as an apostle. This
variety of style accords with the warm and earnest character of the
apostle, which nowhere is manifested more beautifully than in this
Epistle. His bodily frailty, and the chronic malady under which he
suffered, and which is often alluded to
(2Co 4:7; 5:1-4; 12:7-9;
compare Note, see on
2Co 1:8),
must have been especially trying to one of his ardent temperament. But
besides this, was the more pressing anxiety of the "care of all the
churches." At Corinth, as elsewhere, Judaizing emissaries wished to
bind legal fetters of letter and form (compare
2Co 3:3-18)
on the freedom and catholicity of the Church. On the other hand, there
were free thinkers who defended their immorality of practice by infidel
theories
(1Co 15:12, 32-36).
These were the "fightings without," and "fears within"
(2Co 7:5, 6)
which agitated the apostle's mind until Titus brought him comforting
tidings from Corinth. Even then, while the majority at Corinth had
testified their repentance, and, as Paul had desired, excommunicated
the incestuous person, and contributed for the poor Christians of
Judea, there was still a minority who, more contemptuously than ever,
resisted the apostle. These accused him of crafty and mercenary
motives, as if he had personal gain in view in the collection being
made; and this, notwithstanding his scrupulous care to be above the
possibility of reasonable suspicion, by having others besides himself
to take charge of the money. This insinuation was palpably inconsistent
with their other charge, that he could be no true apostle, as he did
not claim maintenance from the churches which he founded. Another
accusation they brought of cowardly weakness; that he was always
threatening severe measures without daring to execute them
(2Co 10:8-16; 13:2);
and that he was vacillating in his teaching and practice, circumcising
Timothy, and yet withholding circumcision from Titus; a Jew among the
Jews, and a Greek among the Greeks. That most of these opponents were
of the Judaizing party in the Church, appears from
2Co 11:22.
They seem to have been headed by an emissary from Judea ("he that
cometh,"
2Co 11:4),
who had brought "letters of commendation"
(2Co 3:1)
from members of the Church at Jerusalem, and who boasted of his purity
of Hebrew descent, and his close connection with Christ Himself
(2Co 11:13, 23).
His partisans contrasted his high pretensions with the timid humility
of Paul
(1Co 2:3);
and his rhetoric with the apostle's plain and unadorned style
(2Co 11:6; 10:10, 13).
It was this state of things at Corinth, reported by Titus, that caused
Paul to send him back forthwith thither with this Second Epistle, which
is addressed, not to Corinth only
(1Co 1:2),
but to all the churches also in Achaia
(2Co 1:1),
which had in some degree been affected by the same causes as affected
the Corinthian Church. The widely different tone in different parts of
the Epistle is due to the diversity which existed at Corinth between
the penitent majority and the refractory minority. The former he
addresses with the warmest affection; the latter with menace and
warning. Two deputies, chosen by the churches to take charge of the
contribution to be collected at Corinth, accompanied Titus
(2Co 8:18, 19, 22).