Bible book
2 Thessalonians
Commentary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown
Save this book and all its available chapters on this device.Book introduction
Introduction to 2 Thessalonians
Commentary chapters
Bible book
Commentary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown
Save this book and all its available chapters on this device.Book introduction
Commentary chapters
THE SECOND EPISTLE OF PAUL THE APOSTLE TO THE
THESSALONIANS
[1] [2]
[3]
INTRODUCTION
Its GENUINENESS is attested by
POLYCARP
[Epistle to the Philippians, 11], who alludes to
2Th 3:15.
JUSTIN
MARTYR
[Dialogue with Trypho, p. 193.32], alludes to
2Th 2:3.
IRENÆUS
[Against Heresies, 7.2] quotes
2Th 2:8.
CLEMENT OF
ALEXANDRIA
[Miscellanies, 1.5, p. 554;
The Instructor, 1.17], quotes
2Th 3:2,
as Paul's words.
TERTULLIAN
[On the Resurrection of the Flesh, 24] quotes
2Th 2:1, 2,
as part of Paul's Epistle.
DESIGN.--The accounts from Thessalonica, after the sending of the
first Epistle, represented the faith and love of the Christians there
as on the increase; and their constancy amidst persecutions unshaken.
One error of doctrine, however, resulting in practical evil, had sprung
up among them. The apostle's description of Christ's sudden second
coming
(1Th 4:13,
&c., and 1Th 5:2),
and the possibility of its being at any time, led them to
believe it was actually at hand. Some professed to know by "the
Spirit"
(2Th 2:2)
that it was so; and others alleged that Paul had said so when with
them. A letter, too, purporting to be from the apostle to that effect,
seems to have been circulated among them. (That
2Th 2:2
refers to such a spurious letter, rather than to Paul's first Epistle,
appears likely from the statement,
2Th 3:17,
as to his autograph salutation being the mark whereby his genuine
letters might be known). Hence some neglected their daily business and
threw themselves on the charity of others, as if their sole duty was to
wait for the coming of the Lord. This error, therefore, needed
rectifying, and forms a leading topic of the second Epistle. He in it
tells them
(2Th 2:1-17),
that before the Lord shall come, there must first be a great
apostasy, and the Man of Sin must be revealed; and that
the Lord's sudden coming is no ground for neglecting daily business;
that to do so would only bring scandal on the Church, and was contrary
to his own practice among them
(2Th 3:7-9),
and that the faithful must withdraw themselves from such disorderly
professors
(2Th 3:6, 10-15).
Thus, there are three divisions of the Epistle: (1)
2Th 1:1-12.
Commendations of the Thessalonians' faith, love, and patience, amidst
persecutions. (2)
2Th 2:1-17.
The error as to the immediate coming of Christ corrected, and the
previous rise and downfall of the Man of Sin foretold. (3)
2Th 3:1-16.
Exhortations to orderly conduct in their whole walk, with prayers for
them to the God of peace, followed by his autograph salutation and
benediction.
DATE OF WRITING.--AS the Epistle is written in the joint names of
Timothy and Silas, as well as his own, and as these were with him while
at Corinth, and not with him for a long time subsequently to his having
left that city (compare
Ac 18:18,
with Ac 19:22;
indeed, as to Silas, it is doubtful whether he was ever subsequently
with Paul), it follows, the place of writing must have been
Corinth, and the date, during the one "year and six months" of
his stay there,
Ac 18:11
(namely, beginning with the autumn of A.D. 52, and
ending with the spring of A.D. 54), say about six
months after his first Epistle, early in A.D.
53.
STYLE.--The style is not different from that of
most of Paul's other writings, except in the prophetic portion of it
(2Th 2:1-12),
which is distinguished from them in subject matter. As is usual in his
more solemn passages (for instance, in the denunciatory and prophetic
portions of his Epistles, for example, compare
Col 2:8, 16,
with 2Th 2:3;
1Co 15:24-28,
with 2Th 2:8, 9;
Ro 1:18,
with 2Th 2:8, 10),
his diction here is more lofty, abrupt, and elliptical. As the former
Epistle dwells mostly on the second Advent in its aspect of glory to
the sleeping and the living saints
(1Th 4:1-5:28),
so this Epistle dwells mostly on it in its aspect of everlasting
destruction to the wicked and him who shall be the final consummation
of wickedness, the Man of Sin. So far was Paul from laboring under an
erroneous impression as to Christ's speedy coming, when he wrote his
first Epistle (which rationalists impute to him), that he had
distinctly told them, when he was with them, the same truths as to the
apostasy being about first to arise, which he now insists upon in this
second Epistle
(2Th 2:5).
Several points of coincidence occur between the two Epistles,
confirming the genuineness of the latter. Thus, compare
2Th 3:2,
with 1Th 2:15, 16;
again,
2Th 2:9,
the Man of Sin "coming after the working of Satan," with
1Th 2:18; 3:5,
where Satan's incipient work as the hinderer of the Gospel, and
the tempter, appears; again, mild warning is enjoined,
1Th 5:14;
but, in this second Epistle, when the evil had grown worse, stricter
discipline
(2Th 3:6, 14):
"withdraw from" the "company" of such.
Paul probably visited Thessalonica on his way to Asia subsequently
(Ac 20:4),
and took with him thence Aristarchus and Secundus: the former became
his "companion in travel" and shared with him his perils at Ephesus,
also those of his shipwreck, and was his "fellow prisoner" at Rome
(Ac 27:2;
Col 4:10;
Phm 24).
According to tradition he became bishop of Apamea.