Bible book
Malachi
Commentary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown
Save this book and all its available chapters on this device.Book introduction
Introduction to Malachi
Commentary chapters
Bible book
Commentary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown
Save this book and all its available chapters on this device.Book introduction
Commentary chapters
THE BOOK OF
[1] [2]
[3] [4]
INTRODUCTION
MALACHI forms the transition link between the two
dispensations, the Old and the New, "the skirt and boundary of
Christianity" [TERTULLIAN], to which perhaps is
due the abrupt earnestness which characterizes his prophecies. His very
name is somewhat uncertain. Malachi is the name of an office, rather
than a person, "My messenger," and as such is found in
Mal 3:1.
The Septuagint favors this view in
Mal 1:1;
translate, not "by Malachi," but "by the hand of His messenger"
(compare
Hag 1:13).
Malachi is the last inspired messenger of the Old Testament, announcing
the advent of the Great Messenger of the New Testament. The
Chaldee paraphrase identifies him with Ezra wrongly, as Ezra is
never called a prophet but a scribe, and Malachi never a scribe but a
prophet. Still it hence appears that Malachi was by some old
authorities not regarded as a proper name. The analogy of the headings
of other prophets, however, favors the common view that Malachi is a
proper name. As Haggai and Zechariah, the contemporary prophets,
supported Joshua and Zerubbabel in the building of the temple, so he at
a subsequent period supported the priest Ezra and the governor
Nehemiah. Like that ruler, he presupposes the temple to have been
already built
(Mal 1:10; 3:1-10).
Both alike censure the abuses still unreformed
(Ne 13:5, 15-22, 23-30),
the profane and mercenary character of the priests, the people's
marriages contracted with foreigners, the non-payment of the tithes,
and want of sympathy towards the poor on the part of the rich
(Ne 6:7)
implies that Nehemiah was supported by prophets in his work of
reformation. The date thus will be about 420 B.C.,
or later. Both the periods after the captivity (that of Haggai and
Zechariah, and that of Malachi) were marked by royal, priestly, and
prophetic men at the head of God's people. The former period was that
of the building of the temple; the latter, that of the restoration of
the people and rebuilding of the city. It is characteristic of the
people of God that the first period after the restoration was
exclusively devoted to the rebuilding of the temple; the political
restoration came secondarily. Only a colony of fifty thousand settled
with Joshua and Zerubbabel in Palestine
(Ezr 2:64).
Even these became intermingled with the heathen around during the sixty
years passed over by Ezra in silence
(Ezr 9:6-15;
Ne 1:3).
Hence a second restoration was needed which should mould the national
life into a Jewish form, re-establishing the holy law and the holy
city--a work effected by Ezra and Nehemiah, with the aid of Malachi, in
a period of about half a century, ending with the deaths of Malachi and
Nehemiah in the last ten years of the fifth century B.C.; that is, the "seven weeks"
(Da 9:25)
put in the beginning of the "seventy" by themselves, to mark the
fundamental difference between them, the last period of Old Testament
revelation, and the period which followed without any revelation (the
sixty-two weeks), preceding the final week standing out in unrivalled
dignity by itself as the time of Messiah's appearing. The seventy weeks
thus begin with the seventh year of Artaxerxes who allowed Ezra to go
to Jerusalem, 457 B.C., in accordance with the
commandment which then went forth from God. Ezra the priest performed
the inner work of purifying the nation from heathenish elements and
reintroducing the law; while Nehemiah did the outer work of rebuilding
the city and restoring the national polity [AUBERLEN]. VITRINGA makes the date
of Malachi's prophecies to be about the second return of Nehemiah from
Persia, not later than 424 B.C., the date of
Artaxerxes' death
(Ne 13:6).
About this time Socrates was teaching the only approach to a pure
morality which corrupt Athens ever knew. MOORE
distinguishes six portions: (1) Charge against Israel for insensibility
to God's love, which so distinguished Israel above Edom
(Mal 1:1-5).
(2) The priests are reproved for neglect and profanation
(Mal 1:6-2:9).
(3) Mixed marriages, and the wrongs done to Jewish wives, are reproved
(Mal 2:10-16).
(4) Coming of Messiah and His forerunners
(Mal 2:17-3:6).
(5) Reproof for tithes withheld
(Mal 3:7-12).
(6) Contrast between the godly and the ungodly at the present time, and
in the future judgment; exhortation, therefore, to return to the law
(Mal 3:13-4:6).
The style is animated, but less grand, and the rhythm less marked,
than in some of the older prophets.
The canonicity of the book is established by the references to it in
the New Testament
(Mt 11:10; 17:12;
Mr 1:2; 9:11, 12;
Lu 1:17;
Ro 9:13).