Android phone or tablet
Open the browser menu and select
Install app or
Add to Home screen.
iPhone or iPad
Tap the browser’s Share button, then select
Add to Home Screen.
Chrome or Edge on a computer
Select the install icon in the address bar or open
the browser menu and select
Install Ebook Web App.
Safari on Mac
Open Safari’s File menu and select
Add to Dock.
2Ch 21:1-4.
JEHORAM
SUCCEEDS
JEHOSHAPHAT.
1-4. Jehoshaphat slept with his fathers . . . Jehoram
. . . reigned--The late king left seven sons; two of
them are in our version named Azariah; but in the Hebrew they appear
considerably different, the one being spelt "Azariah," and the other
"Azariahu." Though Jehoshaphat had made his family arrangements with
prudent precaution, and while he divided the functions of royalty in
his lifetime (compare
2Ki 8:16),
as well as fixed the succession to the throne in his oldest son, he
appointed each of the others to the government of a fenced city, thus
providing them with an honorable independence. But this good intentions
were frustrated; for no sooner did Jehoram find himself in the sole
possession of sovereign power than, from jealousy, or on account of
their connections, he murdered all his brothers, together with some
leading influential persons who, he suspected, were attached to their
interest, or would avenge their deaths. Similar tragedies have been
sadly frequent in Eastern courts, where the heir of the crown looks
upon his brothers as his most formidable enemies, and is therefore
tempted to secure his power by their death.
2Ch 21:5-7.
HIS
WICKED
REIGN.
6, 7. he walked . . . as did the house of Ahab, for he had the daughter
of Ahab to wife--The precepts and examples of his excellent father
were soon obliterated by his matrimonial alliance with a daughter of
the royal house of Israel. Through the influence of Athaliah he
abolished the worship of the Lord, and encouraged an introduction of
all the corruptions prevalent in the sister kingdom. The divine
vengeance was denounced against him, and would have utterly destroyed
him and his house, had it not been for a tender regard to the promise
made to David
(2Sa 7:29;
2Ki 8:19).
2Ch 21:8-17.
EDOM AND
LIBNAH
REVOLT.
8-10. the Edomites revolted--That nation had been made dependent by
David, and down to the time of Jehoshaphat was governed by a tributary
ruler
(1Ki 22:47;
2Ki 3:9).
But that king having been slain in an insurrection at home, his
successor thought to ingratiate himself with his new subjects by
raising the flag of independence [JOSEPHUS]. The
attempt was defeated in the first instance by Jehoram, who possessed
all the military establishments of his father; but being renewed
unexpectedly, the Edomites succeeded in completely emancipating their
country from the yoke of Judah
(Ge 27:40).
Libnah, which lay on the southern frontier and towards Edom, followed
the example of that country.
12-15. there came a writing to him from Elijah the prophet--That
prophet's translation having taken place in the reign of Jehoshaphat
[2Ki 2:11, 12],
we must conclude that the name of Elijah has, by the error of a
transcriber, been put for that of Elisha.
13-19. hast made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem . . . like to
the whoredoms of the house of Ahab--that is, introduced the
superstitions and vices of Phœnician idolatry
(see on
De 13:6-14).
On this account, as well as for his unnatural cruelties, divine
vengeance was denounced against him, which was soon after executed
exactly as the prophet had foretold. A series of overwhelming
calamities befell this wicked king; for in addition to the revolts
already mentioned, two neighboring tribes (see
2Ch 17:11)
made hostile incursions on the southern and western portions of his
kingdom. His country was ravaged, his capital taken, his palace
plundered, his wives carried off, and all his children slain except the
youngest. He himself was seized with an incurable dysentery, which,
after subjecting him to the most painful suffering for the unusual
period of two years, carried him off, a monument of the divine
judgment. To complete his degradation, his death was unlamented, his
burial unhonored by his subjects. This custom, similar to what obtained
in Egypt, seems to have crept in among the Hebrews, of giving funeral
honors to their kings, or withholding them, according to the good or
bad characters of their reign.